UCB’s Code of Practice - Guidance for Students on Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a form of cheating and is a serious academic offence. It arises where work submitted by a student is not their own, but has been taken from another source. The original material is then hidden from the marker, either by not referencing it properly, by paraphrasing it or by not mentioning it at all.
The most common forms of plagiarism are:
• cut/copy and pasted material from the Web;
• copying the work of another student (past or present), including essay material;
• copying course material or lecture notes;
• copying material out of a textbook or journal.
It is important to realise that plagiarism may occur in a number of other forms, as well as in conventional written work. Another student may be involved, or the plagiarism may arise from the misuse of sources outside UCB.
The key is proper attribution of source material. None of the activities listed above is, of itself, necessarily wrong.
Plagiarism is a serious matter for UCB. If not dealt with, it will ultimately devalue all UCB’s degrees to the detriment of both students and UCB. It also introduces a fundamental and inevitable distortion when the work of a student cohort is being assessed.
A student at UCB is expected to submit work that demonstrates compliance with two important prerequisites:
• a level of independent thought, grounded in the teaching received;
• the provision of clear referencing to all sources consulted, both within the main body of the work submitted and in any separate listing of sources.
It should be clear from a consideration of these two key requirements why plagiarism is unacceptable. By definition, a piece of work that has been plagiarised will never be able to meet either of the above criteria. Asking yourself prior to submission whether your work passes both tests is a useful method for determining whether there is likely to be a problem with plagiarism.
UCB accepts that students, particularly in view of the severe penalties that may be applied in cases of serious plagiarism, will be anxious to avoid inadvertently submitting plagiarised work. It is, for example, possible to cite a source in the separate reference list and still commit plagiarism by then incorporating a significant amount of unattributed material taken directly or indirectly (through paraphrasing) from that source into the body of the assignment.
Above all, the student body is not a single grouping and UCB is aware of the need for a sympathetic approach to plagiarism, particularly in the first year of undergraduate studies and where there is no conscious attempt by the student to deceive. However, penalties may be applied at any time.
The onus is on individual students to ensure that the academic conventions applicable to study at University are understood and acted upon. UCB will ensure that you have clear guidance on what is expected of you in terms of the referencing of source material. If you are worried about committing plagiarism, always seek help and advice from your year manager, module lecturer, or programme Assistant Dean. Members of staff are experienced in dealing with questions about proper referencing and will be happy to help.
The Way in Which UCB Deals with Plagiarism
This is a complex area. In broad terms, these are the various stages:
• If UCB is sure that any plagiarism that arises is not deliberate on your part and may be put down to an unfamiliarity with the referencing conventions required for UCB study, then it may simply provide guidance and a warning concerning your future work. Obviously, this position will not be taken with a student where it is reasonable to expect that they would know how to cite source material properly and would normally only apply to Level 4 study and to the early stages of a postgraduate programme;
• If UCB believes that some form of sanction may be necessary, it will first ask you to attend an interview where you will be able to explain in detail the relevant circumstances.
• Following on from the interview, UCB will determine the level of plagiarism (if any) that it believes has arisen.
There are three general categories:
(i) Poor academic practice
(ii) moderate plagiarism
(iii) serious plagiarism
• If UCB considers that a warning is insufficient, it may do one of the following:
(i) require you to resubmit the work, with the mark capped at the pass level;
(ii) reduce the final mark for the work to an appropriate level, including the award of 0;
(iii) reduce the final mark for the entire module involved to an appropriate level, including the award of 0;
(iv) have the case referred, after scrutiny, to the Plagiarism Panel and the University Disciplinary Process. Depending upon the severity of the case and after hearing all the evidence, you may be required to withdraw from UCB.
You should also consult the Code of Practice on Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct. This provides detailed and definitive information on how UCB will deal with plagiarism.